<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reddobe</title>
	<link>http://abari.org/reddobe</link>
	<description>Adobe and Bamboo</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Cven</title>
		<link>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-16</link>
		<author>Cven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=""&gt;There is an example of seven story adobe house in Nuwakot&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You forgot Nau Talle Darbar (Nine stories) in Basantapur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p>There is an example of seven story adobe house in Nuwakot</p></blockquote>
<p>You forgot Nau Talle Darbar (Nine stories) in Basantapur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-15</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Sulav adobe walls generally tend to be thicker then cement. There are two reasons behind this logic, the first, adobe walls were mostly structural or "load bearing" and not built on the "pillar system", so more the weight they had to handle thicker they got. There is an example of seven story adobe house in Nuwakot, which has a wall as thick as six feet...yes..almost two meters!!

Secondly, the thicker adobe walls are, more heat-retaining capacity they have. So for the thermal comfort they could have been thicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sulav adobe walls generally tend to be thicker then cement. There are two reasons behind this logic, the first, adobe walls were mostly structural or &#8220;load bearing&#8221; and not built on the &#8220;pillar system&#8221;, so more the weight they had to handle thicker they got. There is an example of seven story adobe house in Nuwakot, which has a wall as thick as six feet&#8230;yes..almost two meters!!</p>
<p>Secondly, the thicker adobe walls are, more heat-retaining capacity they have. So for the thermal comfort they could have been thicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sulav</title>
		<link>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-14</link>
		<author>Sulav</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-14</guid>
		<description>why does the wall look so thick, normally it is 4 inches thick isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does the wall look so thick, normally it is 4 inches thick isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sulav</title>
		<link>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-13</link>
		<author>Sulav</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://abari.org/reddobe#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I just found an article about Redmud brick obtained from residual mineral, may be its interesting for you:
&lt;b&gt;
http://archive.idrc.ca/books/reports/V212/redmud.html
&lt;b&gt;
i am not sure if the natural Redmud (if it has a high pH level 'acidic', like the residual one ) can be used as a brick if mixed with Sodium Silica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found an article about Redmud brick obtained from residual mineral, may be its interesting for you:<br />
<b><br />
<a href="http://archive.idrc.ca/books/reports/V212/redmud.html" rel="nofollow">http://archive.idrc.ca/books/reports/V212/redmud.html</a><br />
</b><b><br />
i am not sure if the natural Redmud (if it has a high pH level &#8216;acidic&#8217;, like the residual one ) can be used as a brick if mixed with Sodium Silica.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
